homeservicesworkaboutblogfree templatescontactFree Tools →Free AI ModelsResearch LibraryROI CalculatorSavings CalculatorAI Readiness ScoreHire vs. AutomateAutomation Quote
book a 30-min call →
home / free-models / qwen3-5-4b

Qwen3.5 4B

Alibaba · China · Apache 2.0

Commercial use: Yes — free for commercial use

Apache 2.0, no conditions, ungated. Permissive enough to bundle inside a desktop or on-premise product without a licence review.

Parameters4.7B
Active per token4.7B (dense)
Context256K
Modalitytext, image
Memory @ Q4_K_M~2.7 GB
Memory @ Q8_0~4.5 GB
LicenceApache 2.0
Last verified2026-10

Unsloth's Q4_K_M is 2.7 GB and Q8_0 is 4.5 GB, small enough that running it at 8-bit costs almost nothing extra.

Advantages

  • Runs on almost any modern laptop, and on a CPU alone at usable speed, because 2.7 GB of weights is little to read per token
  • Qwen reports 79.9 on TAU2-Bench, level with its 9B sibling, which suggests narrow tool-routing tasks do not need the bigger model
  • Reads images, so a small local classifier can triage scanned documents and screenshots, not only text
  • Cheap enough to run one copy per user or per agent without a GPU budget

Disadvantages

  • General reasoning drops clearly below the 9B: GPQA Diamond 76.2 against 81.7, and LiveCodeBench v6 55.8 against 65.6 on Qwen's table
  • Not on the major hosted free tiers we track, so the realistic route is self-hosting
  • Easy to over-trust. A 4B model that is right 90% of the time on routing still needs a fallback path for the other 10%

Reach for it when

Classification, intent routing, field extraction and guard checks in front of a larger model, especially on CPU-only or edge machines.

Where it falls down

Anything open-ended: drafting, coding, multi-step reasoning or long-document question answering.

Running it

Any 8 GB machine at Q4_K_M, including CPU-only servers. Q8_0 at 4.5 GB is the sensible default if you have the memory. See the hardware sizing tables for how that maps to specific chips and cards, and the quantisation guide for what you give up at each bit width.

will it fitQwen3.5 4B against common GPUs
Qwen3.5 4B at Q4_K_M
0 GB
Qwen3.5 4B at Q8_0
0 GB
RTX 3060 12GB
0 GB
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
0 GB
RTX 4090
0 GB
RTX 5090
0 GB
RTX 6000 Ada
0 GB
A100 80GB
0 GB
H100 80GB
0 GB
Weight sizes for Qwen3.5 4B as recorded in this directory; GPU memory from the hardware table on the directory hub. Weights only: context adds KV cache.
where the weights fitGPU and Mac memory, checked
Q4_K_MQ8_0
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB)✓✓
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (16 GB)✓✓
RTX 4090 (24 GB)✓✓
RTX 5090 (32 GB)✓✓
RTX 6000 Ada (48 GB)✓✓
A100 80GB (80 GB)✓✓
H100 80GB (80 GB)✓✓
Mac, 16 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 24 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 32 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 36 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 64 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 96 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 128 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 192 GB unified✓✓
Mac, 512 GB unified✓✓
✓ fits with room for context, ~ fits with under 15% headroom, ✕ does not fit. Weights only, computed from the figures on this page.

Which cloud instance actually runs this, and what it costs

At Q4_K_M the weights are about 2.7 GB, so 20 catalogued instances fit with room for context, of which the 8 best value are shown. Cheapest per token is Hetzner GEX45 (~$0.32 per million output tokens at an estimated 249 tok/s). Fastest on a single card is Azure NCads H100 v5 at roughly 1241 tok/s for $1.56 per million tokens, which is the speed-versus-cost trade in one line.

InstanceGPUVRAMBandwidthEst. tok/s$/hr$/M tokens
Hetzner GEX45RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell24 GB672 GB/s~249$0.290$0.32
RunPod A100 PCIeA100 80GB80 GB1935 GB/s~717$1.190$0.46
Hetzner GEX131RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q96 GB1792 GB/s~664$1.420$0.59
RunPod L40SL40S48 GB864 GB/s~320$0.790$0.69
RunPod H100 PCIeH100 PCIe80 GB2000 GB/s~741$1.990$0.75
Lambda A100 40GBA100 40GB40 GB1555 GB/s~576$1.990$0.96
Lambda H100 PCIeH100 PCIe80 GB2000 GB/s~741$3.290$1.23
AWS g5.xlargeA10G24 GB600 GB/s~222$1.006$1.26

Token generation on a single request is memory-bandwidth-bound, not compute-bound: the GPU must read every active weight from memory for each token it emits. So the ceiling is roughly GPU memory bandwidth divided by the size of the active weights. A 16 GB model on a 300 GB/s L4 tops out near 19 tokens/sec; the same model on a 2039 GB/s A100 tops out near 127. Figures on model pages are that arithmetic, computed from the bandwidth and weight-size columns here. They are a ceiling for one request at batch size 1, before serving overhead, so treat them as an upper bound for comparing instances rather than a benchmark. Batching raises total throughput well above this and does not raise per-request speed.

For identical silicon, the hyperscalers charge roughly 2 to 5 times what the specialist GPU clouds charge. An A100 80GB is about $3.43/GPU-hr on AWS, $3.67 on Azure and $5.03 on Google Cloud, against $1.19-1.39 on RunPod and $1.99 on Lambda. That spread is the single largest cost lever in a self-hosted inference budget, and it is larger than any saving from picking a smaller model.

Three costs that are absent from every headline rate: egress, storage for the weights, and idle time. A 70B model at Q4 is tens of gigabytes that must be pulled to the instance on every cold start, and an endpoint billed hourly is billed while it sits idle waiting for a request. Rates read 2026-09-06; check each provider's live pricing on the directory hub.

Jurisdiction: China

This is the crucial split most write-ups miss: using a Chinese lab's HOSTED API sends your data to Chinese infrastructure and is a real procurement question. Downloading their OPEN WEIGHTS and running them on your own hardware, or on a Western host, sends nothing anywhere. DeepSeek and Z.ai publish under MIT; Alibaba publishes most of Qwen3 under Apache 2.0. Those are among the most permissive licences on this page.

Watch for: Several US states and a number of government bodies restrict Chinese-hosted AI services on official devices. That restriction is about the hosted service, not about the weights running in your own VPC — but expect to have to explain the difference to a security reviewer.

The paper behind it

This model has a published technical report: arXiv:2505.09388 It is indexed in our research library alongside the work it builds on.

Frequently asked

Can I use Qwen3.5 4B commercially?

Apache 2.0, no conditions, ungated. Permissive enough to bundle inside a desktop or on-premise product without a licence review.

What hardware do I need to run Qwen3.5 4B?

Any 8 GB machine at Q4_K_M, including CPU-only servers. Q8_0 at 4.5 GB is the sensible default if you have the memory. Weights alone are roughly 2.7 GB at Q4_K_M and 4.5 GB at Q8_0. Unsloth's Q4_K_M is 2.7 GB and Q8_0 is 4.5 GB, small enough that running it at 8-bit costs almost nothing extra.. Add KV cache on top of that, which grows with your context length.

What licence is Qwen3.5 4B released under?

Apache 2.0. Full commercial use, modification and redistribution. Patent grant included. The most permissive licence in common use for open-weight models.

Where can I use Qwen3.5 4B for free?

Self-hosting the weights is the free route. Any 8 GB machine at Q4_K_M, including CPU-only servers. Q8_0 at 4.5 GB is the sensible default if you have the memory.

Similar models

Wiring Qwen3.5 4B into something real?

We build the evaluation harness, the failover and the cost ceilings around a model like this, so it survives contact with production.

Maps to AI graphic design and AI automation development. Or see it working: our case studies.